Here’s the deal – mankind is burning fossil fuels at such a
rate that atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) is increasing to unprecedented
levels (in historic times, that is). Plants need CO2 to photosynthesise, and
therefore to grow and produce more of the same. So surely the more CO2 we
humans produce, the better? Sorry – there are a few problems with this
scenario!
Boosting growth
Yes – it is true that plant growth can be stimulated if more
CO2 is available. It has been shown that extra growth of up to one third can be
produced in a CO2 rich environment, and some plant growers have taken advantage
of this fact in their production of crops grown under glass.
There is also an advantage to be gained when water is
scarce. The pores in plant leaves allow CO2 to be absorbed but pores are also responsible
for water loss through evaporation. If the pores do not need to open as much to
admit CO2, because there is plenty to be had, then there are fewer occasions on
which water can be lost.
Not all plants are the same
However, this vision of a greener world with more efficient
food production is not as straightforward as some people might imagine.
For one thing, not all plants are the same. There are
fundamental differences between the methods used by some plants species and
others when it comes to fixing carbon in their tissues from the CO2 that they
absorb. In particular, more than 7,000 plant species are what is known as “C4”
plants, and these would not benefit from any increase in the level of CO2
available to them. These include several important food crops such as maize,
millet, sorghum and sugar cane.
Plant growth in a warmer world
However, the main problem with the “CO2 boosts plant growth”
theory is that atmospheric CO2 is also a greenhouse gas that is a major
contributor to global warming. The uncomfortable fact is that you cannot have
higher levels of CO2, to the benefit of non-C4 crops, without also having
higher world temperatures.
The effects of higher temperatures on plant growth must also
therefore be taken into account. Studies of tree growth in rainforests in
Panama and Malaysia, for example, have shown that a one degree rise in
temperature reduces growth by up to 50%.
Studies of past climate changes have shown that warming
leads to more CO2 being released from land and sea than can be absorbed by
plants. This suggests that any take-up of excess CO2 through increased
photosynthesis will soon be counterbalanced.
A carbon sink?
One advantage of increased photosynthesis might be that CO2
produced by processes such as fossil fuel burning would be absorbed by the
extra plants – both land-based and algae at sea. However, this would only work
if the carbon captured by plants stayed in the ground or the sea and was never
released. This is highly unlikely to happen, especially if the hope is that the
greater prevalence of plants is in the form of food crops – what would be the
point of growing extra food that was never eaten?
Effect on biodiversity
Although some plants could flourish in a warmer world, this
is by no means true for all plants. If certain plants decline – due to problems
over water supply, for example - this will have an impact on animal species. It
has been estimated that 20-30% of all plant and animal species would be
threatened with extinction by the end of this century if global temperatures
continue to rise.
In terms of food crops, global warming would inevitably lead
to patterns of growth being affected, with some plants becoming impossible to
grow in some areas but available in others. This is because successful crop
growing depends on many factors, including soil type, weather patterns and
microclimates.
It will be the richer parts of the world that are better
able to adapt to new conditions than poorer ones.
Biodiversity at sea will also suffer due to the
acidification caused by increased CO2. Effects are already being noticed on
coral reefs, which support a huge range of marine life. Phytoplankton are also
at risk, and a decline in their number will have a major knock-on effect on the
food chain.
The conclusion must therefore be that any short-term
benefits to plant growth caused by increased atmospheric CO2 will soon be
outweighed by the less welcome effects, particularly those resulting from
higher overall temperatures.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment