There is some evidence that there were species of dinosaur
that had feathers, but these were not necessarily the ancestors of modern
birds.
Sinosauropteryx was a carnivorous dinosaur that lived around
125-120 million years ago in what is now China. It was about one metre long.
The fossils that have been discovered show that, instead of reptilian scales,
parts of its body were covered by feathers.
Avimimus was a much later dinosaur (75-70 million years
ago), also from China but slightly larger than Sinosauropteryx at 1.5 metres
long, that also shows evidence that it bore feathers. This is due to the fact
that its arm bones bore ridges of the same size and shape as those found on
modern birds. It also had a mouth that was a similar shape to that of a bird’s
beak.
So can these dinosaurs be seen as the direct ancestors of
birds? The answer is “almost certainly not”, because the fossil record
indicates that birds evolved from a completely different ancestry.
In that case, what was the function of the feathered arms if
they were not the precursors of wings?
The suggestion has been made that these dinosaurs were
warm-blooded and they evolved feathers as a means of keeping warm in winter.
Other dinosaur species appear to have evolved fur for the same reason. It might
also be that coloured feathers could have been useful as camouflage for small
dinosaurs seeking to hide in vegetation.
It is a frequently made mistake to assume that the process
of evolution implies some sort of purpose, in that each change between species
of different time periods denotes a continuous progress from primitive to
advanced. However, that is not the way that evolution works. There are many “dead
ends” in the story of evolution, so it should not surprise us to find common
features in more than one evolutionary sequence of creatures, but also to find
that these features performed different functions.
There was never any certainty that feathers would lead
inevitably to flight. It just so happened that down one evolutionary path this
was the end result, but that was not the case with the two species mentioned
above.
© John Welford
No comments:
Post a Comment